United States Federal Judiciary

Judge Larry Alan Burns

email address of Judge Larry Alan Burns: efile_burns@casd.uscourts.gov

Judge Larry Burns

History and Profile of Judge Larry Alan Burns, trial court judge Southern District of California


      Judge Larry Alan Burns, Federal District Court of the Southern District of California, under scrutinyWhat better person to select to exemplify Federal Court corruption, a judge educated at a Nazarene college, juris doctorate from a Catholic university, University of San Diego, and who from the bench ruled that the Cross is not a religious symbol! 

      Evidence to support accusations that Judge Larry Burns has blatantly abused judicial discretion, violated oath of office, fabricated, twisted, and intentionally and maliciously misconstrued and misrepresented facts for apparent self-serving agendas and bias is published in the article 'Evidence and Facts To Support No Confidence In The Judiciary'.  The article refers to court documents that specifically demonstrate that Burns maliciously lied about facts.  Several cases are focused on including one involving a victimized couple who came before him pro se with an issue of government employees who had repeatedly violated their constitutional rights, unjustly threatened them with bodily harm, stalked them and terrorized them causing so much mental harm they could not function properly for their livelihood.

       Burns twisted facts, and accepted twisted facts from defense attorney to protect the government employees from liability.  The defendants invoked immunity using twisted and misrepresented facts, therefore the defendants never answered the complaint because Burns accepted those facts despite their obvious falsehood and misconstruction of actual fact.  When the couple appealed the case in forma pauperis Burns interfered by lying and twisting facts again.  He pointed to facts he claimed existed in the record, but in fact did not exist, and from these fictitious facts claimed the couple lied in their complaint for damages.  He claimed the pro se couple asked for damages based on lost wages from employment however their complaint and administrative claim stated their claimed loss was an expected salary.  It was based on work they had been doing, which was grant writing, and the financial loss was the expected salary income from grants that could have been awarded had they not been interfered with.  Grant writing was wrongfully interfered with therefore the claimed loss was based on denial of ability to submit grants and be able to have a salary from them.

      Armed with his invented fact he claimed the couple either lied in their complaint or lied in their application to proceed in forma pauperis.  However his lie can be detected by examination of the record therefore his lie can be evidenced.  The public can access the records therefore anyone can learn the truth of the matter.  In the end Larry Alan Burns will pay a high price for lying as it is grounds to be impeached and be deprived of his job.

      In another case Burns twisted facts and seized on unrelated rules to strip a U.S. Ambassador to Russia of his diplomatic immunity involving an auto accident in that country. See: Kashin v. Kent page.

Trail of a Dishonorable Judge

Evidence and Facts to Support No Confidence In The Judiciary
Judge Burns Example

Judge Burns Packing Heat
Six Guns and a Lot of Fear

Judge Burns above the Law
Public Servant Elitism and Arrogance

Judge Burns History
Under Investigation by Friends of Skolnik

Judge Burns Evidence of Lies
Facts are Facts, or Are They?

Judge Burns and Judicial Tricks Summary Judgment Abuse
The pro se couple's story in retrospect
Judge Burns and Kashin v. Kent
Burns Grabs at Straws

Judge Burns Violates Free Speech Rights, Threatens Pro Se Couple

Sends Armed Court Police to Threaten

Judge Burns Orders Seizure and Destruction of Privately Owned Historic Cabin
No Trial, No Jury, No Due Process

Judge Burns Law Shopper
and Alchemist

Larry Alan Burns Has Ties In Georgia

The Armenian Correspondent
"Far beyond rehearsing statute, he has brainwashed university, graduate
school, and statսte school сlassrooms for centuriеs."  Quote from the Armenian Correspondent

Judge Larry Burns Speaks About Guns
Publicly Self Revealed As Traitor To The Constitution
Point    Counterpoint
The Peoples Answer; We Are Not Your Servant! The Editor's answer

Judge Larry Alan Burns Under Investigation by Ninth Circuit and U.S. House Of Representatives

Friends of Investigative Reporter Sherman Skolnick Follow the Rogue Trail!

Point Loma Nazarene University Implicated In Scandal From Burns Investigation, 3/2/2011

Point Loma Nazarene Prof. Teaches Koran Contains Death Threat

March 29, 2011: Novel Legal Theory.

      Federal Judges intentional refusal to uphold and protect citizens Constitutional Civil
Rights equates unconstitutional seizure of citizens Constitutional Rights.  This seizure equates treachery against citizens of The United States of America thus is an act against The United States. Which act in turn abets Interests outside of The United States. Which in turn Equates Treason.  To date, no federal judge has upheld or protected 9th Amendment unalienable rights.  Therefore the federal judiciary as a whole is guilty of treason.  Treason is the betrayal of trust by Webster's definition, but see U.S. Code.


      United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states "whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States." 


Return To Entry Page