| Words, phrases and cases useful in understanding the Federal Court system | | Artful Recasting of Facts/Misrepresentation | | Plausibility Pleading/Barring the Court House Doors | | Duty of a Judge, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain About O'Scannlain | | Immunity and Bivens Actions | | Pro Se, Appearing for Oneself | | Rights, Authority, Morality | The Lucifer Effect/Power Corrupts
Why judges go rogue. 2 | 9th Amendment Unalienable Rights
Federal Courts Refusal to Uphold! | | Truth | U.S v. Grace, et al, 461 U.S.
Right to protest, contention that unfit judges must be removed from the bench. First Amendment right upheld by the Supreme! | | Williamson v. U.S.D.A, Public Servant Loss of Immunity | Behavioral Law -Violation of Unalienable Rights
Behavioral Law Defined | | Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress A Stand Alone Tort | | Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God | Judge D. Brock Hornby
Summary Judgment violates seventh amendment | | Federal Employee Abuse of Citizens' Rights, Judiciary Refuses to Protect | | Customized Litigation | | Bivens Action and Robbins, Judiciary Guts Citizen's Right for Redress of Constitutional Rights Violation | Res ipsa loquitur
The thing speaks for itself | Summary Judgment Motions
Summary Judgment and Malice
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby
∗Judgment Without A Trial
By Judge D. Brock Hornby
Response to Summary Judgment Motions
Summary Judgment Defined
Discretion to Deny Summary Judgment-Rule 56
Penalty for fraudulent Summary Judgment Motions
Summary Judgment Motion Abuse Gender Issues, Judge Burns' corruption parallels (see PDF page 4 and 20)
Summary Judgment Abuse, Judicial Corruption Personified, and your Loss of Rights (based on a true story)
| Contemporary Issues In The U.S. Courts
U.S. Courts Governing US Judicial and Political Commentary
Roberts Unleashes Vast Federal Power | Procedures
Pre-trial
Removal
What every litigator should know.
Motions To Dismiss
Grounds and Strategy | Attorney Duty/Ethics
Duty, Diligence, Ethics
California
ABA Code of Conduct/Ethics
Attorney Client Relationship
Stockton v. Ford
U.S. Supreme Court 1850 | | Principles of U.S. Citizenship | Law Day May 1, 2013
Eisenhower, Reagan
Mountain States Legal Foundation |
| This website is primarily concerned with the judicial branch of the United States government and a question of whether or not it violates the public trust placed in it.
American citizens have a right to know whether or not the justice system they uphold is fair and unbiased, and to know what they can do if it is not.
This website reveals information, evidence and factual events that support a finding of no confidence in the U.S. Judiciary. Without confidence in the judiciary no one can feel safe, or is safe, in their home, at work or in public.
Charges of no confidence are serious and will be supported by verifiable facts along with knowledge of the Constitution, knowledge of law and knowledge of wrong versus right.
Wrong vs. Right is a case of morality and, for our interpretation of morality, we will use the interpretation predominate at the time of the founding of the United States.
We use this interpretation because without it the Constitution would mean very little, and understanding it would be futile.
Indeed the Constitution is currently under attack by secular individuals as well as anti-God religions such as Islam. These entities well understand that the Creator referred to in the Declaration of Independence is God of the Bible and it is their target to destroy anyone who believes and follows God.
The United States government is composed of three balancing entities, legislative, executive and judiciary. It is a republic based on justice, liberty, equality and Christianity, created by an instrument called the Declaration of Independence.
The United States government was created by people of an agrarian society who believed in God, community, liberty, pursuit of happiness, justice, unalienable rights, Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
They believed the government they created had legitimacy only as long as their beliefs and unalienable rights were upheld. They also believed if any of the three branches of government became destructive to their beliefs and rights, and the mechanisms set forth in the Constitution to balance and correct such occurrence failed, the government would lose legitimacy, and the people retain the Natural Law Right to establish new government.
The Constitution is a contract. It is a social contract with the people who created it and continue to honor it. In other words it is contract citizens made onto themselves.
Natural Law viewpoint of 'freedom' of contract is, "I am bound because I intend to be bound." This statement reveals the essence of 'freedom' as understood in Natural Law and embodies the essence of what it means to 'be American'.
Government exists because of, and operates according to, the social contract that derived its binding force from the sovereignty of the individual wills of the people. As our founding document indicates, and Constitution makes clear, our unalienable rights supersede government authority and government is only legitimate as long as it abides the contract which includes keeping the sovereignty of the people inviolate.
If government fails to abide the contract it becomes illegitimate and the contract becomes voidable. This means citizens then have the unalienable right and power to elect to avoid legal relations created by the contract and to replace government.
| Judge Larry Burns 
About Judge Larry Alan Burns JUDGE BURNS THREATENS INNOCENT CITIZENS WITH DEADLY FORCE AT THEIR HOME Update December 3, 2012
JUDGE BURNS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE JUDICIAL COUNSEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT AND THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Federal Judge Sentenced to Jail | Modus Operandi
M.O. of a corrupt judge
Denying admission of certain evidence
Ignoring or supporting perjury
Manipulating procedure
Permitting unsubstantial claim or disregarding valid assertions
|
Endurance v. Action
Peoples Court, 2012
|
Political News
Political News
News Flash:
U.S. Citizens to declare WAR on the United States Government?
The Coming of the Second American Revolution 3-3-2015
|
Legal News
Legal News
Constantly Updated Page
|
National News
What Is Wrong With Americans?
Washington Times
Liberals Attack 1st Amendment
American Sniper
|
| | Hierarchy of
American Judicial Authority, listed highest to lowest |
JUS NATURALE
Natural Law | |
U.S. Supreme Court | | U.S. Circuit Courts | |
U.S. District Courts | Cases of Interest
Sackett v. EPA
Federal Agency Compliance orders reviewable
Islam Threat to Constitution
Complaint Cause
Case example: Questioning the legitimacy of our federal government, filed June 6, 2011 in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals PDF
| Agencies of the Executive Branch
U.S.D.A. Forest Service Corruption Scandal Exposed, U.S.D.O.J. and U.S. Judiciary Implicated!
USDA Forest Service Exposed
USDA Forest Service Citizen Abuse Scandal | Information on Judicial Conduct
Code of Conduct for Federal Judges
ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct
Failure of Federal Oversight
Failure to Recuse
House Committee Report
Examining Recusal after Caperton
| Information of Constitutional Interest
Legacy of Judge Robert Bork
The Right of Revolution
University of Chicago, The Founders Constitution
| Legal Information Links
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Applies to all federal trial courts
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 9th Circuit
U.S. Code
The Administrative Procedure Act
5 U.S.C. § 702
Judicial Recusal
Judicial Conduct Rules
Judicial Contruction
| Books
Books for Lawyers and Pro Se citizens
Answers to questions about civil procedure in state and federal courts.
Jones McClure publishing, O'Connor's Federal Rules. Civil Trials 2012, do not go to court without it!
Attorney Malpractice: Law & Procedure By David J Meiselman | Legal Malpractice
Standard of Care in Legal Malpractice
Fraud Upon The Court
Attorney Malpractice
The Elements And Proving The Underlying Case
Punitive Damages In Attorney Malpractice
By Mark L. Thompson
Fraud, Deceit, Misrepresentation Are More Than Malpractice | Legal Doctrine, Canon
The way Judges think about law
See Judge Burns parallels
The Four Pillars of Constitutional Doctrine
by Professor Suzanna Sherry | | |
|
