US Courts

The Federal Judiciary Under Scrutiny
by U. S. Courts Governing US

About Judicial Corruption
Evidence of Judicial Corruption
Evidence and Facts Support No Confidence in the Judiciary
The Law of Nations, 2

Words, phrases and cases useful in understanding the Federal Court system
Artful Recasting of Facts/Misrepresentation
Plausibility Pleading/Barring the Court House Doors
Duty of a Judge, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain  About O'Scannlain
Immunity and Bivens Actions
Pro Se, Appearing for Oneself
Rights, Authority, Morality
The Lucifer Effect/Power Corrupts
Why judges go rogue.
9th Amendment Unalienable Rights
Federal Courts Refusal to Uphold!
U.S v. Grace, et al, 461 U.S.
Right to protest, contention that unfit judges must be removed from the bench.  First Amendment right upheld by the Supreme!
Williamson v. U.S.D.A, Public Servant Loss of Immunity
Behavioral Law -Violation of Unalienable Rights
Behavioral Law Defined
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress A Stand Alone Tort
Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God
Judge D. Brock Hornby
Summary Judgment violates seventh amendment
Federal Employee Abuse of Citizens' Rights, Judiciary Refuses to Protect
Customized Litigation
Bivens Action and Robbins, Judiciary Guts Citizen's Right for Redress of Constitutional Rights Violation
The American's Creed
Officer of the Court
Lex Talionis
1, 2
Res ipsa loquitur
The thing speaks for itself
Summary Judgment Motions

Summary Judgment and Malice
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby

Judgment Without A Trial
By Judge D. Brock Hornby

Response to Summary Judgment Motions

Summary Judgment Defined

Discretion to Deny Summary Judgment-Rule 56

Penalty for fraudulent Summary Judgment Motions

Summary Judgment Motion Abuse Gender Issues, Judge Burns' corruption parallels (see PDF page 4 and 20)

Summary Judgment Abuse, Judicial Corruption Personified, and your Loss of Rights (based on a true story)
Contemporary Issues In The U.S. Courts

U.S. Courts Governing US Judicial and Political Commentary

Roberts Unleashes Vast Federal Power
What every litigator should know.

Motions To Dismiss
Grounds and Strategy
Attorney Duty/Ethics

Duty, Diligence, Ethics

ABA Code of Conduct/Ethics

Attorney Client Relationship
Stockton v. Ford
U.S. Supreme Court 1850
Principles of U.S. Citizenship
Law Day May 1, 2013
Eisenhower, Reagan
Mountain States Legal Foundation
      This website is primarily concerned with the judicial branch of the United States government and a question of whether or not it violates the public trust placed in it.

      American citizens have a right to know whether or not the justice system they uphold is fair and unbiased, and to know what they can do if it is not.

      This website reveals information, evidence and factual events that support a finding of no confidence in the U.S. Judiciary. Without confidence in the judiciary no one can feel safe, or is safe, in their home, at work or in public. 

Charges of no confidence are serious and will be supported by verifiable facts along with knowledge of the Constitution, knowledge of law and knowledge of wrong versus right.

      Wrong vs. Right is a case of morality and, for our interpretation of morality, we will use the interpretation predominate at the time of the founding of the United States.

      We use this interpretation because without it the Constitution would mean very little, and understanding it would be futile.

      Indeed the Constitution is currently under attack by secular individuals as well as anti-God religions such as
Islam.  These entities well understand that the Creator referred to in the Declaration of Independence is God of the Bible and it is their target to destroy anyone who believes and follows God.

      The United States government is composed of three balancing entities, legislative, executive and judiciary.  It is a republic based on justice, liberty, equality and Christianity, created by an instrument called the Declaration of Independence.

      The United States government was created by people of an agrarian society who believed in
God, community, liberty, pursuit of happiness, justice, unalienable rights, Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. 

      They believed the government they created had legitimacy only as long as their beliefs and unalienable rights were upheld. They also believed if any of the three branches of government became destructive to their beliefs and rights, and the mechanisms set forth in the Constitution to balance and correct such occurrence failed, the government would lose legitimacy, and the people retain the Natural Law Right to establish new government.

      The Constitution is  a  contract.
  It is a social contract with the people who created it and continue to honor it.  In other words it is contract citizens made onto themselves.

      Natural Law viewpoint of 'freedom' of contract is, "I am bound because I intend to be bound."  This statement reveals the essence of 'freedom' as understood in Natural Law and embodies the essence of what it means to 'be American'.

      Government exists because of, and operates according to, the social contract that derived its binding force from the sovereignty of the individual wills of the people.  As our founding document indicates, and Constitution makes clear, our unalienable rights supersede government authority and government is only legitimate as long as it abides the contract which includes keeping the sovereignty of the people inviolate.

      If government fails to abide the contract it becomes illegitimate and the contract becomes voidable.  This means citizens then have the unalienable right and power to elect to avoid legal relations created by the contract and to replace government.


Judge Larry Burns

Judge Larry Burns

About Judge Larry Alan Burns


Update December 3, 2012

Federal Judge Sentenced to Jail


Modus Operandi
M.O. of a corrupt judge
Denying admission of certain evidence
Ignoring or supporting perjury
Manipulating procedure
Permitting unsubstantial claim or disregarding valid assertions

Endurance v. Action
Peoples Court, 2012

Political News

Political News

News Flash:
U.S. Citizens to declare
WAR on the United States Government?

The Coming of the Second American Revolution 3-3-2015

Legal News

Legal News
Constantly Updated Page

National News

What Is Wrong With Americans?
Washington Times

Liberals Attack 1st Amendment

American Sniper

Hierarchy of American Judicial Authority, listed highest to lowest
Natural Law
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Circuit Courts
U.S. District Courts
Cases of Interest

Sackett v. EPA
Federal Agency Compliance orders reviewable

Islam Threat to Constitution
Complaint    Cause

Case example: Questioning the legitimacy of our federal government, filed June 6, 2011 in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals PDF
Agencies of the Executive Branch

U.S.D.A. Forest Service Corruption Scandal Exposed, U.S.D.O.J. and U.S. Judiciary Implicated!

USDA Forest Service Exposed

USDA Forest Service Citizen Abuse Scandal
Information on Judicial Conduct

Code of Conduct for Federal Judges

ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct

Failure of Federal Oversight

Failure to Recuse

House Committee Report
Examining Recusal after Caperton

Information of Constitutional Interest

Legacy of Judge Robert Bork

The Right of Revolution
University of Chicago, The Founders Constitution
Legal Information Links

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Applies to all federal trial courts

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 9th Circuit

U.S. Code

The Administrative Procedure Act
5 U.S.C. § 702

Judicial Recusal

Judicial Conduct Rules

Judicial Contruction

Books for Lawyers and Pro Se citizens

Answers to questions about civil procedure in state and federal courts. 
 Jones McClure publishing, O'Connor's Federal Rules. Civil Trials 2012, do not go to court without it!

Attorney Malpractice: Law & Procedure

By David J Meiselman

Legal Malpractice

Standard of Care in Legal Malpractice

Fraud Upon The Court

Attorney Malpractice
The Elements And Proving The Underlying Case

Punitive Damages In Attorney Malpractice
By Mark L. Thompson
Fraud, Deceit, Misrepresentation Are More Than Malpractice
Legal Doctrine, Canon
The way Judges think about law
Judge Burns parallels
The Four Pillars of Constitutional Doctrine
by Professor Suzanna Sherry

Go To US Courts Governing US Home Page
About US Courts Gov US Contact U.S. Courts Gov US
Judicial Conduct  Sherman Skolnick  Judicial Corruption & Treason Watch
About The United States Courts  Library  FAQ's  Newsroom American Creed

Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ?

President George Washington